Date: 2009-05-16 08:01 pm (UTC)
It's not so much that I think Trek shouldn't be updated as that I think it doesn't need to be in order to justify its central position in SF history. And I think if I'd found the movie more satisfying that even that wouldn't have been a meaningful objection - a good piece of entertainment is worthwhile even if it doesn't feature the first interracial kiss on TV or capture the imagination of an entire generation.

This (http://punkadiddle.blogspot.com/2009/05/star-trek-2009.html) is a really great review of the film that also talks about what made Star Trek (or at least Next Generation and onwards) special that the film is totally missing.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

dragojustine: (Default)
dragojustine

December 2020

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930 31  

Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags