abigail_n ([identity profile] abigail-n.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] dragojustine 2009-05-16 08:01 pm (UTC)

It's not so much that I think Trek shouldn't be updated as that I think it doesn't need to be in order to justify its central position in SF history. And I think if I'd found the movie more satisfying that even that wouldn't have been a meaningful objection - a good piece of entertainment is worthwhile even if it doesn't feature the first interracial kiss on TV or capture the imagination of an entire generation.

This (http://punkadiddle.blogspot.com/2009/05/star-trek-2009.html) is a really great review of the film that also talks about what made Star Trek (or at least Next Generation and onwards) special that the film is totally missing.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting